February 13, 2026

Building a Red Teaming Program: From Assessment to Continuous Mitigation

Generative AI (GenAI) adoption accelerates across industries in 2026, bringing transformative potential alongside escalating risks. Prompt injection, jailbreaks, data leakage, harmful content generation, and agentic misbehavior can lead to breaches, misinformation, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage. A dedicated red teaming program shifts organizations from reactive patching to proactive resilience, uncovering vulnerabilities systematically before adversaries exploit them.

Building an effective program requires structured progression: initial assessment, capability development, execution, and transition to continuous mitigation. This post outlines practical steps, key considerations, and actionable strategies to establish and mature a GenAI red teaming initiative.

Phase 1: Initial Assessment and Planning

Start with foundational evaluation to set realistic scope and secure buy-in.

  • Conduct a maturity assessment
    • Map current GenAI usage across departments
    • Inventory models, applications, RAG pipelines, and agents
    • Identify high-risk use cases (customer support, code generation, decision support, content creation)
  • Define program objectives aligned to business impact
    • Reduce incident likelihood in priority domains
    • Support compliance with emerging regulations
    • Build evidence for trustworthy AI claims
  • Establish governance and sponsorship
    • Secure executive sponsorship from CISO, CTO, or Chief AI Officer
    • Form a cross-functional steering group (AI engineering, security, legal, ethics, product)
    • Create a risk taxonomy based on OWASP Top 10 for LLMs, Agentic AI risks, and internal threat models
  • Set success metrics early
    • Vulnerability discovery rate
    • Attack success rate reduction over time
    • Time-to-mitigation for critical findings
    • Coverage percentage of production GenAI surfaces

Phase 2: Building the Team and Capabilities

Assemble people, processes, and tools tailored to GenAI's unique challenges.

  • Recruit or upskill core talent
    • AI/ML engineers familiar with model behavior
    • Cybersecurity specialists experienced in adversarial testing
    • Domain experts (e.g., child safety, finance, healthcare) for contextual harm evaluation
    • Ethicists or behavioral scientists for socio-technical nuance
  • Adopt hybrid testing methodology
    • Manual for creative jailbreaks and multi-turn scenarios
    • Automated for scale (prompt fuzzing, regression suites)
    • Use attacker LLMs to generate variants and simulate adaptive adversaries
  • Select and integrate essential tools
    • Garak for broad vulnerability scanning
    • PyRIT for multi-turn and agentic attack automation
    • Promptfoo for prompt-level regression and evaluation
    • Custom scripts for runtime monitoring and chaos-style perturbation
  • Develop standardized processes
    • Create attack playbooks mapped to risk categories
    • Define severity scoring (e.g., low/medium/high/critical based on exploitability and impact)
    • Establish safe testing environments (sandboxed APIs, mock tools)

Phase 3: Execution – From First Engagements to Program Maturity

Launch targeted exercises and scale systematically.

  • Begin with scoped pilots
    • Target one high-risk application or model version
    • Focus on top threats (prompt injection, tool misuse, data exfiltration)
    • Run hybrid tests: automated broad sweeps followed by manual deep dives
  • Structure each engagement
    • Planning: Define threat model, objectives, rules of engagement
    • Execution: Generate attacks, log chains, capture evidence
    • Analysis: Score findings, identify root causes
    • Reporting: Produce technical details plus executive summary
  • Prioritize findings for remediation
    • Critical issues block release or trigger immediate fixes
    • High-severity drive prompt hardening, guardrail updates, or alignment retraining
    • Track remediation SLAs and verify fixes through re-testing
  • Expand coverage iteratively
    • Add multimodal and agentic scenarios
    • Test runtime drift and long-horizon behaviors
    • Incorporate new research (e.g., goal manipulation, memory poisoning)

Phase 4: Transition to Continuous Mitigation

Shift from periodic exercises to embedded, always-on defense.

  • Integrate red teaming into development lifecycles
    • Embed automated scans in CI/CD pipelines
    • Require red team sign-off before major model or prompt updates
    • Run shadow testing in staging environments
  • Implement continuous probing
    • Schedule recurring automated campaigns
    • Use synthetic adversarial datasets for drift detection
    • Monitor production logs for anomalous patterns
  • Build feedback loops for improvement
    • Feed discovered attacks into training data for better alignment
    • Update guardrails and filters based on trends
    • Maintain an evolving attack library
  • Foster organizational learning
    • Conduct post-engagement debriefs
    • Share anonymized lessons across teams
    • Run internal training on emerging techniques
  • Measure program effectiveness over time
    • Track trend in attack success rate
    • Monitor reduction in production incidents
    • Evaluate coverage growth and mitigation velocity

Common Challenges and Practical Solutions

Several obstacles arise when scaling a program.

  • Resource constraints
    • Start small with high-impact areas
    • Leverage open-source tools and community benchmarks
  • Resistance to findings
    • Frame results as collaborative risk reduction
    • Use severity scoring tied to business impact
  • Keeping pace with model evolution
    • Prioritize runtime and regression testing
    • Subscribe to threat intelligence feeds on new jailbreaks
  • Measuring subjective harms consistently
    • Combine LLM judges with human review panels
    • Use ensemble scoring for borderline cases

Conclusion: From Program Launch to Security Advantage

A mature GenAI red teaming program evolves from initial vulnerability hunting into a continuous mitigation engine. By progressing through structured assessment, capability building, rigorous execution, and embedded operations, organizations gain verifiable resilience against sophisticated threats.Investing in this discipline delivers multiple returns:

  • Prevents high-profile incidents
  • Accelerates safe innovation
  • Demonstrates responsibility to regulators and customers
  • Attracts talent committed to trustworthy AI

As GenAI capabilities expand toward greater autonomy and real-world integration, proactive adversarial testing becomes non-negotiable. Organizations that build robust red teaming programs today position themselves to harness generative technologies securely, turning potential risks into managed strengths in an AI-driven future. For a comprehensive overview of The Complete Guide to GenAI Red Teaming, refer to the pillar blog The Complete Guide to GenAI Red Teaming: Securing Generative AI Against Emerging Risks in 2026.

More blogs