Last quarter, we rolled out a new version of our flagship API, designed to streamline data integration for our enterprise clients. Our team at doc-e.ai had meticulously crafted three core documentation pages to support the release:
We followed best practices, incorporating code samples, interactive "Try It" features, and clear error-handling scenarios. Internal testing showed a 95% success rate for first-time API calls, and our team was confident. We published the docs, announced the release, and waited for the developer community to dive in.
Within days, our documentation feedback system lit up. Our platform, built to collect user comments on every doc page, recorded 50 comments in just two weeks—an unusually high volume for a new release. Developers were vocal, and their feedback pointed to a recurring issue: the API wasn’t behaving as documented.
/data/sync
endpoint keeps timing out. Is there a rate limit not mentioned here?”invalid_grant
errors.”At first, we assumed the issue was with the documentation. Were the instructions unclear? Were code samples outdated? We audited the docs against our quality checklist, which includes over 70 criteria for accuracy, clarity, and completeness. The docs passed with flying colors. So, if the documentation wasn’t the problem, what was?
To get to the root cause, we turned to our documentation analytics and API usage metrics, integrated into the doc-e.ai platform. Here’s what we found:
/data/sync
endpoint and authentication errors spiked by 40% compared to the previous release.These metrics suggested the issue wasn’t the documentation but the API itself. We escalated the feedback to our engineering team, sharing the developer comments and usage data. The engineering team reproduced the issues and identified a critical bug: the API’s token refresh mechanism was rejecting valid refresh tokens due to a misconfigured OAuth server. This caused the 401 errors and “invalid_grant” responses developers reported.
Armed with developer feedback, our engineering team deployed a hotfix within 48 hours. We updated the API to align with the documented behavior, ensuring the token refresh flow worked as intended. To address the /data/sync
endpoint timeouts, we increased the server capacity and added a rate limit note to the API Reference.
We didn’t stop there. To rebuild trust, we took the following steps:
The results were immediate and measurable:
Most importantly, the developer community felt heard. One commenter wrote, “Thanks for the quick fix! The new auth guide is spot-on, and the API is working like a charm now.”
This experience reinforced three key principles at doc-e.ai:
This incident inspired us to double down on our feedback-driven approach. We’re rolling out new features to the doc-e.ai platform, including:
At doc-e.ai, we’re committed to making API documentation a seamless part of the developer experience. Three docs and 50 comments helped us uncover a broken API—and reminded us that listening to developers is the key to building products they love.
Have feedback on our docs or APIs? Drop us a comment on our documentation portal or reach out at support@doc-e.ai. Let’s build something great together!